NEWS

5mK vs 40mK NETD in Thermal Cameras

5mK vs 40mK NETD in Thermal Cameras

Thermal imaging engineering note

25mK vs 40mK NETD in Thermal Cameras

Can you actually see the difference—or is lower NETD only a better-looking number on the datasheet?

Conceptual comparison of 25mK and 40mK thermal sensitivity Two grayscale thermal gradients. The 25mK example preserves finer tonal steps while the 40mK example groups subtle differences more coarsely. LOW-CONTRAST SCENE — CONCEPTUAL VIEW 25mK finer temperature separation 40mK coarser separation of subtle differences
Illustration only. A fair comparison requires the same lens, scene, gain settings, processing and test conditions.

Quick answer: 25mK usually makes the biggest difference when the scene contains small temperature variations. In a high-contrast scene, a well-tuned 40mK module may look almost as useful. In a wall, circuit board or distant target close to ambient temperature, 25mK has more room to preserve weak thermal detail.

What NETD actually measures

NETD stands for Noise Equivalent Temperature Difference. It is a signal-to-noise measure, expressed in millikelvin, that describes how small a temperature difference the imaging system can separate from its own noise.

Lower is better. A 25mK specification represents 0.025°C of temperature difference; 40mK represents 0.040°C. That does not mean the camera will measure absolute temperature to ±0.025°C or ±0.040°C. It means the imaging chain can resolve smaller thermal variations under the stated test conditions.

That distinction matters because thermal sensitivity, temperature accuracy and detector resolution answer three different questions:

Specification What it tells you What it does not tell you
NETD How well the system separates small temperature differences from noise Absolute measurement accuracy
Temperature accuracy How close a reported temperature is to the real value How smooth or detailed the image will look
Detector resolution How many thermal pixels sample the scene How small a temperature difference each pixel can resolve
Frame rate How often the image updates Thermal sensitivity or spatial detail

25mK vs 40mK: the difference in numbers

The gap is 15mK. Put another way, 25mK is 37.5% lower than 40mK. But image quality is not a percentage score, so it would be wrong to say a 25mK camera is “37.5% better.” The visible result depends on the scene, the lens, detector behavior, image processing and display settings.

25mK

lower noise threshold
40mK

higher noise threshold

The practical question is not whether 25 is lower than 40. It is whether the target contains enough subtle temperature structure for that lower noise threshold to matter.

Can you actually see the difference?

High thermal contrast

Often less obvious

A hot motor against a cool workshop, a heated pipe, a person outdoors at night or a badly overheated connector already produces a strong signal. Both 25mK and 40mK modules can render the target clearly.

Low thermal contrast

Usually more useful

Small gradients across insulation, moisture-related surface patterns, early electronic heating or a distant target close to background temperature are harder. Lower NETD gives the image pipeline more weak signal to work with.

In low-contrast scenes, 25mK can preserve smoother tonal transitions and cleaner edges before aggressive sharpening is applied. The result is not necessarily a dramatic “before and after.” It is often a quieter background, better separation between neighboring surfaces and fewer details buried in temporal noise.

Lower NETD matters most when the scene is difficult—not when the target is already glowing against the background.

A practical Boundvis 640×512 comparison

Boundvis lists two compact 640×512 modules: the B640A1 25mK thermal camera module and the B640A2 40mK thermal camera module. Both use a 9mm focal length and share a published 46.2° × 37.7° field of view. Their system specifications differ in more than NETD, which makes this a useful product-selection comparison—but not a controlled laboratory A/B test.

Parameter B640A1 B640A2
Detector resolution 640 × 512 640 × 512
NETD ≤25mK at f/1.0, 50Hz, 300K ≤40mK
Frame rate 50Hz 60Hz
Lens / FOV 9mm / 46.2° × 37.7° 9mm / 46.2° × 37.7°
Video configuration CVBS (PAL) CVBS / USB configuration
Control UART UART, 115200 baud
Input voltage 4.5–18V 5–18V
Power consumption ≤0.8W ≤0.8W
Size 21 × 21 × 29.8mm 21 × 21 × 34.48mm
Weight 23g 24.5g
Important: these models also differ in frame rate, interface configuration, length and weight. A claim such as “the B640A1 image is better because it is 25mK” would need side-by-side footage recorded with matched settings and conditions.

The compact 640×512 B640A1 is the more natural fit when weak thermal contrast is the main concern and a compact CVBS module meets the architecture. The 60Hz B640A2 configuration is worth considering when the design values motion rendering or its interface configuration more than the last step in thermal sensitivity.

What else controls the image?

Lens F-number

The lens determines how much infrared energy reaches the detector. NETD values should be compared at the same F-number. The B640A1 specification states its ≤25mK condition at f/1.0, 50Hz and 300K—details that should remain attached to the headline number.

Image processing

Automatic gain control, temporal noise reduction, edge enhancement and local contrast can change the apparent sharpness of a thermal image. Strong processing can make a noisy image look punchy in a screenshot while removing weak, useful temperature structure.

NUC and calibration state

Non-uniformity correction and shutter control suppress fixed-pattern variation across the detector. A module that is due for NUC may look streaky or uneven, regardless of the NETD value printed on its datasheet.

Focus, range and atmosphere

Poor focus can erase the benefit of a sensitive detector. At longer distances, humidity, fog, rain and atmospheric absorption reduce target contrast before the signal reaches the lens.

Where 25mK earns its place

  • Building inspectionUseful when the task involves subtle surface patterns associated with insulation gaps, thermal bridges or moisture.
  • ElectronicsHelpful for early-stage heating where neighboring components differ by only a small amount.
  • Mechanical maintenanceMore valuable when looking for gradual temperature changes rather than obvious hotspots.
  • Long-range observationCan preserve more target detail when the object approaches the thermal background, although the lens and target pixel coverage still set the range.
  • Research and developmentBetter suited to work where weak thermal gradients must remain visible for later analysis.

When 40mK is already enough

There is no benefit in buying sensitivity that the application cannot use. A 40mK module can be entirely appropriate when:

  • The target is normally much warmer or colder than its surroundings.
  • The task is detection or navigation rather than subtle thermal analysis.
  • 60Hz motion rendering is more important than the lowest available NETD.
  • The project requires a particular PAL or UVC thermal camera interface.
  • Size, power, cost and supply availability dominate the design decision.

For many surveillance, robotic and general monitoring systems, 40mK still provides strong usable contrast. A complete module that fits the signal path is usually a better engineering choice than a lower-NETD core that forces extra conversion hardware.

How to compare NETD figures fairly

Before placing two datasheets side by side, check the conditions behind the number:

  1. F-number: compare f/1.0 with f/1.0, not with a slower optic.
  2. Scene or detector temperature: 300K is roughly 27°C; sensitivity can be quoted at different temperatures.
  3. Frame rate and integration time: longer integration can improve sensitivity but may affect motion performance.
  4. Typical or guaranteed: a typical value and a maximum value are not equivalent promises.
  5. Processing state: confirm whether the figure describes the detector, the camera core or the final processed output.
  6. Measurement method: ask whether both products were tested using the same standard and setup.

If those conditions are missing, the NETD figure is useful as a clue—not as a complete decision.

Which one should an OEM choose?

Start with the scene, not the number. A complete thermal camera module selection process should define the smallest thermal difference that matters, the target size, working distance, field of view, output interface and frame-rate requirement. Then use NETD to refine the shortlist.

Project requirement Stronger priority
Subtle temperature gradients 25mK
Building-envelope or electronics detail 25mK
High-contrast targets 40mK may be sufficient
Smoother motion at 60Hz Check the B640A2 configuration
Compact 23g CVBS core Check the B640A1 configuration
Absolute temperature measurement Confirm radiometric capability and accuracy separately

Frequently asked questions

Is 25mK NETD better than 40mK?

It indicates higher thermal sensitivity under comparable test conditions. The advantage is most useful in low-contrast scenes. It does not guarantee that every 25mK camera will outperform every 40mK camera because optics, calibration and processing also matter.

Can the human eye see a 15mK difference?

You do not see the NETD number directly. You see its effect through image noise, tonal separation and the visibility of weak thermal structure. In an easy scene the difference may be small; in a difficult scene it can be meaningful.

Is NETD the same as temperature accuracy?

No. NETD describes sensitivity to small temperature differences. Accuracy describes how close a measured temperature is to the true value. A camera can have very low NETD and still have an accuracy specification measured in degrees Celsius.

Is 40mK good for a thermal camera?

Yes. For general monitoring, navigation and high-contrast detection, 40mK can be a strong specification. Lower NETD becomes more important when the application depends on subtle temperature gradients.

Does lower NETD increase detection range?

It can improve visibility when a distant target has weak contrast against the background. Detection range still depends heavily on focal length, aperture, detector resolution, target size, atmosphere and the number of pixels placed on the target.

Which matters more: resolution or NETD?

They solve different problems. Resolution determines how many spatial samples describe the target. NETD determines how well the camera separates small temperature differences. A useful system needs enough of both for the application.

The decision is about the scene

25mK is not a universal “better image” switch. Its advantage appears when the scene contains weak thermal contrast and the rest of the optical chain is good enough to preserve it. In easy scenes, 40mK may deliver everything the application needs while offering a frame-rate or interface configuration that fits the system better.

For OEM selection, compare complete modules: NETD, resolution, lens, FOV, frame rate, interface, calibration behavior, power and mechanical envelope. The best specification is the one that survives contact with the actual product design.

Talk to an engineer

Send us the scene before choosing the module.

Share the target size, working distance, required FOV, frame rate, interface and available module space. Boundvis can help match the thermal core to the system rather than asking you to design around a single headline specification.

Technical references

  1. FLIR: Thermal Camera Specs You Should Know Before Buying
  2. Teledyne FLIR OEM: Comparing Sensitivity of Thermal Imaging Camera Modules
  3. Teledyne FLIR OEM: Lens F-number and NEdT
  4. Boundvis IR module specification sheet, revision supplied July 2026.
© 2026 Boundvis. Technical specifications are subject to revision.
Previous
PAL vs UVC for Infrared Camera Modules
Next
OEM Thermal Camera Modules: What Can Be Customized?